KONAN 2011

[KRUŠKO]

Najveći broj pozitivnih komentara na trejlere i fotke iz novog filma dolazi upravo od žena koji su svi u stilu:-Da li postoji zgodnije stvorenje na svetu od Džejsona?

Pa nisu producenti blesavi.

[Shieldmaiden]

Žene nisu isto što i devojčice.

Zanimljivo kako je Konan u filmu dlakav, a na posterima nema ljubavni tepih.

[KRUŠKO]

Prve kritike filma od ljudi koji poznaju materiju su katastrofalne.Jedan od njih je svakako i Škotlanđanin Al Haron koji je posle pljuvačine ipak ostavio tračak optimizma za buduće filmove a koji se odnosi na Džejsona kao Konana.
Cela kritika na linku dole.

Conan the Barbarian (2011) is better than I was expecting in some respects, and worse than I was anticipating in others. On pure cinematic merits, it is not as successful as the 1982 film or Solomon Kane, but it is not quite as heinous as Conan the Destroyer or Kull the Conqueror either. In terms of adapting Robert E. Howard’s creation, it’s only marginally more faithful than any of its predecessors, just in different respects. Jason Momoa, with the right director, script and story, could be a fine interpretation of Howard’s Conan: there are brief, wonderful moments in the film where I momentarily forgot what film I was watching, and he’s definitely closer to REH than Arnold’s ever was. The basic story is still pathetic, some of the effects are simply atrocious, and there’s no thematic core, philosophy or subtlety to speak of – on the other hand, the natural scenery of Bulgaria is a joy to behold, some of the effects are surprisingly solid, and there’s a pervasive sense of enthusiasm from the cast that can be woefully lacking in these sorts of films. In short, some parts better, some parts worse, but overall, much as how I expected it to end up.